For when we talk about the spreading power and influence of globalization, arent we really referring to the spreading economic and military might of the US?
We must create a kind of globalization that works for everyone... and not just for a few.
We have benefited greatly from the globalization of the economy in the last 30 years.
In the US, most progressives start to see the differences between internationalism and economic globalization.
Diversification and globalization are the keys to the future.
The regime of globalization promotes an unfettered marketplace as the dynamic instrument organizing international relations.
It is people who are the objects of globalization and at the same time its subjects. What also follows logically from this is that globalization is not a law of nature, but rather a process set in train by people.
So is it always nationalist to resist US globalization? The US thinks it is, and wants you to agree; and, moreover, to consider US interests as being universal ones.
People now realize that globalization is not only for the multi-nationals and the circulation of money.
Ironically, xenophobic nationalists are utilizing the benefits of globalization.
We also have a cultural phenomenon: the emergence of a global culture, or of cultural globalization
It has been said that arguing against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity.
Globalization, far from putting an end to power diplomacy between States, has, on the contrary, intensified it.
We have to choose between a global market driven only by calculations of short-term profit, and one which has a human face.
Contagion has become very much a phenomenon, and it's a phenomenon of globalization.
We must ensure that the global market is embedded in broadly shared values and practices that reflect global social needs, and that all the world's people share the benefits of globalization.
Well, we see an increasingly weaker labor movement as a result of the overall assault on the labor movement and as a result of the globalization of capital.
Globalization requires taking a broad contextual and long-term view.
That's just globalization. It's got good sides as well. But scenes aren't allowed to develop on their own anymore. Everyone knows about everything.
corporate globalization is being relentlessly and arbitrarily imposed on an essentially feudal society, tearing through its complex, tiered social fabric, ripping it apart culturally and economically.
[Globalization] has enriched the world scientifically and culturally and benefited many people economically as well.
Globalization is a complex issue, partly because economic globalization is only one part of it. Globalization is greater global closeness, and that is cultural, social, political, as well as economic.
I'm generally in favor of economic globalization. Having said that, it doesnt always work and does not immediately work in the interest of all. There are sufferers.
The themes that the anti-globalization protesters bring to the discussion are of extraordinary importance. However, the theses that they often bring to it, sometimes in the form of slogans, are often oversimple.
I think we will become disenchanted with the glamour of globalization.
Globalization is a fact of economic life
We Have Got To Bring Corporate America To Its Knees
Globalization has rendered the world increasingly interdependent, but international politics is still based on the sovereignty of states.
Improved productivity is another direct benefit of globalization.
We would not be enjoying those cellphones and those tablets at the price where they are had it not been for globalization, both in terms of trade and in terms of constant technological innovation.
Consumption has massively benefited from globalization.
Globalization is now no longer an objective but an imperative, as markets open and geographic barriers become increasingly blurred and even irrelevant.
Complementing the nation-state as it reaches its limits amid globalization: That is what Europe must offer.
Globalization is a form of totalitarianism... It is the rich who rule, and the poor live as they can.
Globalization offers us enormous opportunities in the race to leapfrog in development processes. It also obliges us to set in motion processes which would minimize its risks.
The rise of globalization, the rise of finance capital, the elimination of the manufacturing base, the decimation of the working class, particularly in terms of those who had some comforts that approximated what the middle class had.
I don't think massification and globalization and all those other 'izations' are necessarily hostile to regionalism.
Clearly, the Global Economy isn't working for workers in China and Indonesia and Burma any more than it is for workers here in the United States.
There is a growing consensus that Globalization must now be reshaped to reflect values broader than simply the freedom of capital.
In an excess of examples, the walk to globalization has additionally implied the minimization of women and young ladies. What's more that must change.
The myth of the inevitability of economic globalization is based largely on the work of Milton Friedman, and easily the most underreported story of our time is that the current economy proves Friedman flatly wrong.
I support freedom and I support a free market economy, but it should be a socially oriented market economy. I support globalization, but it should be globalization with a human face.
Contrary to the received wisdom, global markets are not unregulated. They are regulated to produce inequality.
Education, particularly higher education, will take Africa into the mainstream of globalization.
Globalization is not a monolithic force but an evolving set of consequences - some good, some bad and some unintended. It is the new reality.
In a world of scarce resources, globalization without new technology is unsustainable.
The downsides of globalization are indeed painful, ... But taking the bigger pills against its ills is superior to living inside a sterile bubble.
One of the paradoxes of globalization is that, in the developing world, we've seen massive reductions in property.
Recent rampage is a function of the exponential growth of populations and economies. It has to do with globalization and the steady increase in computational power.
Globalizing a bad thing makes it worse. But globalizing a good thing is usually good.
In the cabaret of globalization, the state shows itself as a table dancer that strips off everything until it is left with only the minimum indispensable garments: the repressive force.
I was really educating myself on the environment, but I didnt realize it was so connected to politics, connected to globalization.
This is a basic requirement the meaning of globalization is that we should admit that the economy of each country is dependent on the economy of all the others.
There is more uncertainty than usual about job futures because computers are replacing more and more human intelligence, and globalization is proceeding at an accelerating pace.
Power that controls the economy should be in the hands of elected representatives of the people instead of an industrial oligarchy
Globalization has made copper and other minerals more valuable, and Ghana and Kenya have recently discovered mineral resources.
Militarism. . . is the chief bulwark of capitalism. When it is that militarism is undermined, capitalism will fail.
We had much freer trade in the 19th century. We have much less globalization now than we did then.
The Internet is the most effective instrument we have for globalization.
Too often we participate in the globalization of indifference. May we strive instead to live global solidarity.
If globalization seeks to bring all of us together, but to do so respecting each person, each individual person's peculiarity, that globalization is good and makes us good and grow and leads to peace.