Occasionally I do things against my inner voice, but you really should go for the thing that touches you most-even if you don't quite know why it does.
No film should try to follow a trend, and do what film people think the public wants. There's no such thing as knowing what the public wants.
I have always tried to work according to what affects me, to a script that I like because it touches me in some way, without deliberately pursuing a commercial career or a particular image.
I think that can happen, that two people can love each other and not be able to get on at all.
I think actors are privileged. Acting feeds you.
I think in every generation there's a certain amount of, not awe exactly, but that sort of awareness of other people's achievements.
People ask, how do you cope, and all I can say is that you do.
I've never believed much in that holding hands kind of love. I've always thought that love is about two different personalities trying to confront life, trying to make sense of their responsibilities, to themselves, to each other, and to the wider society.
But, you know, as you get older, my God, the parts get more varied. There's a lot of fun to be had doing a lot of different things.
An emotional performance is usually more instinctive to an actor.
You've got to have steel in you somewhere.
You can't always go by the book, even in comedy.
You can time a part perfectly and play it badly. And some people have very individual offbeat timing, which is their own. It works simply because they are who they are.
I do believe in living out your own time, unless it's absolutely impossible, which it is for some people.