We're certainly disappointed that North Carolina has decided to seek legal action when it's clearly spelled out in the Master Settlement Agreement that disputes over payments, which this is, should be resolved through binding arbitration.
We're pleased with the ruling that confirms that the disadvantages of the Master Settlement Agreement were a significant factor of our market share loss.
We're disappointed that they've (California) decided to seek legal action when it's clearly spelled out in the Master Settlement Agreement that disputes over payment go before an arbitration panel.