Why is it the philosopher who is expected to be easier and not some scientist who is even more inaccessible?
As soon as there is language, generality has entered the scen.
In certain situations, there is a classical function and responsibility there that must not be avoided, even if it is just to appeal to good sense.
I believe it is always a writer who is accused of being someone who is engaged in an explanation with language, the economy of language.
These critics organize and practice in my case a sort of obsessive personality cult which philosophers should know how to question and above all, to moderate.