This Supreme Court nominee presents extraordinary circumstances, requiring a filibuster.
What appears to be going on here is some sort of compromise. The court feels strongly about national security and the president's ability to conduct foreign affairs and military affairs, yet also responsible for the rule of law.
There's a contradiction between the two, and as always, the Supreme Court wins, and that bodes ill for the California case.
What the court has decided now is that 'we are the sole and exclusive arbiter of what needs to be disclosed.' That rule seems somewhat extreme.
I don't think even conservatives believe the court is ready to overturn Roe v. Wade.