My first take on it was that one of those elements of pay would have been okay but all three of them ... added together seems to me to be too much.
In the vast majority of cases, personal use of corporate aircraft is an invalid use of shareholders' money. If we're going to pay them more, I'd rather see it related to performance.
Small companies are still seeing significant pay growth.
Their pay doesn't have anything to do with the level of responsibility. And it doesn't seem to have anything to do with how well they run their companies, either.
This is a classic example of pay for failure.