(Nick) does create negatives to go with his positives, ... because he's got positives. But he cannot be turning it over every other time down the floor. And as good as he is at penetrating, he's not as good a perimeter shooter, so he's got to pick his spots better.
Nick Grant is a good example. He's getting it figured out about when to drive, and when to pull it out and use his abilities.
Maybe we've had more problems with them than other teams have, but that's a reflection more on us. We just haven't been as good as they have been as a team.
I am disappointed that the sophisticated businessmen involved in this dispute have failed to strike a deal. There should be enough money and enough good sense to make a deal work for everyone. The only people hurt by this dispute are the fans.
I always take a day-to-day approach. With my age, you just don't know. There could be health issues. And some of it is mental. If you don't have fun doing what you're doing, if you lose the part that's enjoyable about it, then you're not going to do a good job anyway.
Our inside guys have really developed nicely, and Jonathan Cox is a good example of that. And our guards do a pretty good job of rebounding. We've had pretty good balance.
We have quickness, we have athletic ability, good hands and good heads. We just don't have good games.
Even though we might have been as talented, we weren't as good (as 2004-05). We didn't execute as good as we did a year ago.
If you don't have fun doing what your doing, if you lose that part of it that's enjoyable about this, then you're not going to do a good job anyway.
It's the way they built their program, and their success has come from that. And yet they have very good offensive players.
That's the first good news I've heard in a while.