One should not assume that the outstanding problems all have to do with the issue of so-called peaceful use or civilian use.
So I haven't seen any of the parties coming forward to say that they are prepared to fund such a thing, so we are talking about a theoretical issue at this period.
What we have made clear is that we will have a discussion on the issue of peaceful nuclear energy, and in particular the subject of the provision of a light water reactor, but only at an appropriate time.
So whether the issue of future civilian use is going to be that important an issue or not, I can't say at this point.
I want to emphasize that the issue of nuclear weapons in the DPRK must be solved,
Don't assume that this one issue of so-called civilian use is the only issue out there,
The issue is how we express the elements in the text.
The issue is the tactics of how we express the elements of the document.
The issue of getting rid of nuclear weapons should be an obvious one, should be an easy one,